The P/E ratio measures how cheaply valued a company’s stock price is by dividing the current stock price to its earnings-per-share (EPS). It indicates the dollar amount an investor can expect to invest in a company to receive $1 of that company’s earnings. Genpact P/E ratio is 21.49. it has increased by a third in comparison to the same period last year. this metric is one of the most popular because it easily summarizes the status of the company. however, in order to make an informed decision, more metrics should be analysed. Let’s dive into Genpact’s P/E ratio
What is Genpact P/E Ratio?
Genpact’s P/E ratio is 21.49, which represents a 3.72% increase over the same period last year. their average P/E ratio is 23.8 and their 5-year average is 22.56.
What is Genpact Net EPS?
Genpact’s net earnings for the most recent quarter were 2.02 US dollars, which represents a 7.45% increase over the same period last year.
Who are Genpact Competitors?
Based on Jika.io AI model, Digital China Holdings, Accelya Solutions India, Broadridge Financial Solutions, EPAM Systems, ExlService Holdings, Mindteck (India), Perficient, WNS (Holdings) are considered to be Genpact’s competitors because the companies operate within the same industry as Genpact and are targeting the same customer base. in addition, competitors typically share a similar market capitalization as Genpact.
Who is Genpact’s Biggest competitor?
Genpact’s biggest competitor is Digital China Holdings, based on the Jika.io AI model. it has a similar market capitalization to Genpact in the industry, it dominates a similar share of the market as Genpact, and it provides and markets very similar services.
What industry is Genpact in?
Genpact is part of the Information Technology Services and Technology sector.
Genpact vs Digital China Holdings
Market Cap: Genpact’s Market Cap of 8022505984 is higher than Digital China Holdings Market Cap of 6510031872.
Average Volume: Genpact’s Average Volume of 1.186M is lower than Digital China Holdings Average Volume of 1.469M.
Beta: Genpact’s Beta of 1.4 is higher than Digital China Holdings Beta of 0.81.
Revenue: Genpact’s Revenue of 4.022B is higher than Digital China Holdings Revenue of 20.539B.
Net Income: Genpact’s Net Income of 369.448M is lower than Digital China Holdings Net Income of 711.588M.
Gross Profit: Genpact’s Gross Profit of 1.432B is lower than Digital China Holdings Gross Profit of 3.765B.
Ebitda: Genpact’s Ebitda of 702.135M is higher than Digital China Holdings Ebitda of 1.023B.
P/E Ratio: Genpact’s P/E Ratio of 22.22 is lower than Digital China Holdings P/E Ratio of 8.46.
P/S Ratio: Genpact’s P/S Ratio of 1.94 is higher than Digital China Holdings P/S Ratio of 0.18.
P/B Ratio: Genpact’s P/B Ratio of 4.35 is higher than Digital China Holdings P/B Ratio of 0.44.
P/FCF Ratio: Genpact’s P/FCF Ratio of 18.21 is higher than Digital China Holdings P/FCF Ratio of -1.79.
ROE: Genpact’s ROE of 0.2 is higher than Digital China Holdings ROE of 0.05.
ROA: Genpact’s ROA of 0.08 is higher than Digital China Holdings ROA of 0.02.
Return On Capital Employed: Genpact’s Return On Capital Employed of 0.14 is higher than Digital China Holdings Return On Capital Employed of 0.04.
Gross Profit Margin: Genpact’s Gross Profit Margin of 0.35 is higher than Digital China Holdings Gross Profit Margin of 0.12.
Assets (Total): Genpact’s Assets (Total) of 4.975B is higher than Digital China Holdings Assets (Total) of 29.601B.
Debt (Total): Genpact’s Debt (Total) of 1.965B is lower than Digital China Holdings Debt (Total) of 4.19B.
Genpact vs Accelya Solutions India
Market Cap: Genpact’s Market Cap of 8022505984 is lower than Accelya Solutions India Market Cap of 13112198144.
Average Volume: Genpact’s Average Volume of 1.186M is lower than Accelya Solutions India Average Volume of 20013.0.
Beta: Genpact’s Beta of 1.4 is higher than Accelya Solutions India Beta of 0.53.
Revenue: Genpact’s Revenue of 4.022B is higher than Accelya Solutions India Revenue of 2.904B.
Net Income: Genpact’s Net Income of 369.448M is lower than Accelya Solutions India Net Income of 422.01M.
Gross Profit: Genpact’s Gross Profit of 1.432B is lower than Accelya Solutions India Gross Profit of 1.705B.
Ebitda: Genpact’s Ebitda of 702.135M is lower than Accelya Solutions India Ebitda of 962.126M.
P/E Ratio: Genpact’s P/E Ratio of 22.22 is higher than Accelya Solutions India P/E Ratio of 18.85.
P/S Ratio: Genpact’s P/S Ratio of 1.94 is lower than Accelya Solutions India P/S Ratio of 3.73.
P/B Ratio: Genpact’s P/B Ratio of 4.35 is lower than Accelya Solutions India P/B Ratio of 5.38.
P/FCF Ratio: Genpact’s P/FCF Ratio of 18.21 is higher than Accelya Solutions India P/FCF Ratio of 15.62.
ROE: Genpact’s ROE of 0.2 is lower than Accelya Solutions India ROE of 0.28.
ROA: Genpact’s ROA of 0.08 is lower than Accelya Solutions India ROA of 0.21.
Return On Capital Employed: Genpact’s Return On Capital Employed of 0.14 is lower than Accelya Solutions India Return On Capital Employed of 0.33.
Gross Profit Margin: Genpact’s Gross Profit Margin of 0.35 is lower than Accelya Solutions India Gross Profit Margin of 0.46.
Assets (Total): Genpact’s Assets (Total) of 4.975B is higher than Accelya Solutions India Assets (Total) of 3.435B.
Debt (Total): Genpact’s Debt (Total) of 1.965B is lower than Accelya Solutions India Debt (Total) of 388.513M.
Genpact vs Broadridge Financial Solutions
Market Cap: Genpact’s Market Cap of 8022505984 is lower than Broadridge Financial Solutions Market Cap of 17438687232.
Average Volume: Genpact’s Average Volume of 1.186M is lower than Broadridge Financial Solutions Average Volume of 452961.0.
Beta: Genpact’s Beta of 1.4 is higher than Broadridge Financial Solutions Beta of 0.96.
Revenue: Genpact’s Revenue of 4.022B is lower than Broadridge Financial Solutions Revenue of 4.994B.
Net Income: Genpact’s Net Income of 369.448M is lower than Broadridge Financial Solutions Net Income of 547.5M.
Gross Profit: Genpact’s Gross Profit of 1.432B is higher than Broadridge Financial Solutions Gross Profit of 1.423B.
Ebitda: Genpact’s Ebitda of 702.135M is lower than Broadridge Financial Solutions Ebitda of 974.8M.
P/E Ratio: Genpact’s P/E Ratio of 22.22 is lower than Broadridge Financial Solutions P/E Ratio of 31.85.
P/S Ratio: Genpact’s P/S Ratio of 1.94 is lower than Broadridge Financial Solutions P/S Ratio of 3.15.
P/B Ratio: Genpact’s P/B Ratio of 4.35 is lower than Broadridge Financial Solutions P/B Ratio of 9.54.
P/FCF Ratio: Genpact’s P/FCF Ratio of 18.21 is lower than Broadridge Financial Solutions P/FCF Ratio of 49.25.
ROE: Genpact’s ROE of 0.2 is lower than Broadridge Financial Solutions ROE of 0.31.
ROA: Genpact’s ROA of 0.08 is higher than Broadridge Financial Solutions ROA of 0.07.
Return On Capital Employed: Genpact’s Return On Capital Employed of 0.14 is higher than Broadridge Financial Solutions Return On Capital Employed of 0.1.
Gross Profit Margin: Genpact’s Gross Profit Margin of 0.35 is higher than Broadridge Financial Solutions Gross Profit Margin of 0.28.
Assets (Total): Genpact’s Assets (Total) of 4.975B is lower than Broadridge Financial Solutions Assets (Total) of 8.12B.
Debt (Total): Genpact’s Debt (Total) of 1.965B is lower than Broadridge Financial Solutions Debt (Total) of 4.191B.
Genpact vs EPAM Systems
Market Cap: Genpact’s Market Cap of 8022505984 is lower than EPAM Systems Market Cap of 17827715072.
Average Volume: Genpact’s Average Volume of 1.186M is lower than EPAM Systems Average Volume of 758756.0.
Beta: Genpact’s Beta of 1.4 is lower than EPAM Systems Beta of 1.76.
Revenue: Genpact’s Revenue of 4.022B is higher than EPAM Systems Revenue of 3.758B.
Net Income: Genpact’s Net Income of 369.448M is lower than EPAM Systems Net Income of 481.652M.
Gross Profit: Genpact’s Gross Profit of 1.432B is higher than EPAM Systems Gross Profit of 1.274B.
Ebitda: Genpact’s Ebitda of 702.135M is higher than EPAM Systems Ebitda of 680.27M.
P/E Ratio: Genpact’s P/E Ratio of 22.22 is lower than EPAM Systems P/E Ratio of 37.9.
P/S Ratio: Genpact’s P/S Ratio of 1.94 is lower than EPAM Systems P/S Ratio of 4.28.
P/B Ratio: Genpact’s P/B Ratio of 4.35 is lower than EPAM Systems P/B Ratio of 6.96.
P/FCF Ratio: Genpact’s P/FCF Ratio of 18.21 is lower than EPAM Systems P/FCF Ratio of 46.23.
ROE: Genpact’s ROE of 0.2 is higher than EPAM Systems ROE of 0.19.
ROA: Genpact’s ROA of 0.08 is lower than EPAM Systems ROA of 0.13.
Return On Capital Employed: Genpact’s Return On Capital Employed of 0.14 is lower than EPAM Systems Return On Capital Employed of 0.2.
Gross Profit Margin: Genpact’s Gross Profit Margin of 0.35 is higher than EPAM Systems Gross Profit Margin of 0.34.
Assets (Total): Genpact’s Assets (Total) of 4.975B is higher than EPAM Systems Assets (Total) of 3.523B.
Debt (Total): Genpact’s Debt (Total) of 1.965B is lower than EPAM Systems Debt (Total) of 239.158M.
Shareholders Equity: Genpact’s Shareholders Equity of 1.897B is lower than EPAM Systems Shareholders Equity of 2.487B.
About Genpact
Genpact Limited provides outsourcing services for business processes and information technology (IT) services in India, the rest of Asia, North and Latin America and Europe. it operates in three segments: Banking, Capital Markets and Insurance; Consumer Goods, Retail, Life Sciences and Healthcare; and High Tech, Manufacturing and Services. the company offers CFO advisory services and environmental, social and governance services, such as data management, carbon accounting, human rights assessment, sustainability diligence and ESG reporting. it also provides finance and accounting services, including accounts payable, such as document management, invoice processing, approval and resolution management, and travel and expense processing; invoice-to-cash services, including customer master data management, credit and contract management, fulfillment, billing, collection and dispute management; record-to-report services, including accounting, treasury, tax, product cost accounting and closing and reporting services; financial planning and analysis consisting of budgeting, forecasting and business performance reporting; and enterprise risk and compliance services, including operational risk and controls. in addition, the company provides supply chain advisory services and after-sales services; sourcing and procurement services, including direct and indirect strategic sourcing, category management, spend analytics, procurement operations and master data management; and sales and commercial services, including campaign, order and dispute management, lead generation, pricing and promotion optimization. furthermore, it offers IT services, which include end-user computing support, infrastructure management, application production support and database management services, and transformation services, which include digital solutions, consulting services and analytics services and solutions. the company was founded in 1997 and is based in Hamilton, Bermuda.
https://www.nativesnewsonline.com
